Multi-Family Office (MFO)
A Multi-Family Office (MFO) provides comprehensive family office services to multiple wealthy families through a shared platform, combining professional expertise with cost efficiency.
Key Characteristics
Shared Infrastructure
- Professional investment and administrative teams
- Institutional-grade technology and reporting platforms
- Shared office facilities and operational systems
- Economies of scale across multiple families
Professionalized Services
- Dedicated Chief Investment Officer (CIO) and investment committee
- Experienced family office professionals
- Standardized governance and reporting frameworks
- Access to institutional investment opportunities
Cost-Effective Model
- Shared costs across multiple families reduce individual burden
- Professional management without full SFO overhead
- Access to expertise that might be cost-prohibitive for individual families
Service Offerings
Investment Management
- Professional portfolio management and oversight
- Access to alternative investments and private markets
- Risk management and performance monitoring
- Tax-efficient investment strategies
Administrative Services
- Consolidated reporting across all assets
- Cash management and liquidity planning
- Coordination with external service providers
- Technology platforms for family access
Advisory Services
- Estate and tax planning coordination
- Next-generation education and governance
- Philanthropic planning and implementation
- Lifestyle and concierge services (often available)
Ideal For
Asset Threshold: Typically $30M-$100M in investable assets
Family Profile: Families wanting professional management without SFO costs
Service Needs: Desire for comprehensive services with shared infrastructure benefits
Cost Structure
- Management Fees: Typically 0.75-1.5% of assets under management
- Retainer Fees: Often $50K-$500K+ annually for administrative services
- Project Fees: Additional charges for specialized services
- Minimum Fees: Usually $250K-$1M+ annually regardless of asset level
Advantages
- Cost Efficiency: Lower costs than maintaining an SFO
- Professional Management: Access to experienced investment professionals
- Diversified Expertise: Broader range of specialists and services
- Institutional Access: Entry to investments typically reserved for larger institutions
- Reduced Overhead: No need to manage staff and infrastructure
Considerations
- Less Control: Investment decisions may be committee-based
- Shared Resources: Staff attention divided among multiple families
- Standardization: Less customization than SFO model
- Potential Conflicts: Need to manage interests across different families
Related Resources
Main Pages
Popular FAQ
- What is a Multi-Family Office?
- Family Office vs Wealth Management
- Family Office Costs
- Minimum Net Worth Requirements
- Family Office Services Explained
- What is a Fractional Family Office?
- How to Find Family Office Investors
- Family Office Professional
- What's a Family Office?
- Family Office vs Hedge Fund